Search for: "Secretary of Agriculture v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm by Unknown
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Medicare Like Rates)United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
They provide the normative and operational standard for the implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for business and human rights structured around three pillars:[3]• The State duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business enterprises, through policies, regulation and adjudication. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
H.R.3047 - Apache County and Navajo County Conveyance Act of 2023 / To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain lands within the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest, and for other purposes. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The dismissed federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (American Indian Agricultural Resources Management Act - Leases)Allergan INC. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (American Indian Agricultural Resources Management Act - Leases)Allergan INC. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 4:20 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  Levine along with a host of other plaintiffs, including The Humane Society of the United States, sued to overturn this interpretation. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm by NARF
United States (Partition Trust Land; Administrative Procedures Act) United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
As people in the United States moved from the countryside into cities, their milk supply became increasingly unhealthy. [read post]