Search for: "Secretary of Interior v. California" Results 1 - 20 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: In 2005, Amador County, California brought suit against the Department of Interior challenging the Secretary’s approval of a gaming compact between the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians (the “Tribe”) and the State of California. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
We must decide whether theGovernor nonetheless has the authority to concur in the Interior Secretary’s determination to allow gaming on tribal trust land in California. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community. 2. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
§ 2701 et seq.) allows gaming on Indian lands acquired by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) in trust for a tribe’s benefit after October 17, 1988, if, among other things, the Secretary determines it would be in the tribe’s best interest and not detrimental to the surrounding community, and the governor of the state where the land is located concurs with the determination. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
California, omitting lands above Lake Mead, and inducing reliance on limited water supplies by others with rights junior to the Navajo Nation to the detriment of the Nation. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Prisoners - Religious Freedom) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html In re Abbigail A. [read post]