Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 4,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James Goodman
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:51 pm by Jarod Bona
Antitrust doctrine in the United States and throughout the world is constantly adjusting to both economic and academic developments. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
He signed an employment eligibility verification form, where he wrote a Social Security number and provided a resident alien card that attested to his eligibility to work in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:10 am by Doug Cornelius
Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations I expect the full text of his remarks will be published in the next few days, but these are my notes. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:10 am by Doug Cornelius
Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations I expect the full text of his remarks will be published in the next few days, but these are my notes. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am by paperstreet
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. noted in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. noted in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]