Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 3,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
 Insurance Law & Securities D&O Policies Securities and State-Law Suits Exclusions Inadequate Consideration Claim Wisconsin Law    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:09 pm by CAFE
Code § 1315, Law enforcement authority of Secretary of Homeland Security for protection of public property Bivens v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author David Gair The principal contention in the tax refund case of Exxon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm
Jan. 28, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a class action lawsuit against Apple, Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Sophie Fritz
Sept. 08, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District dismissed the putative class action of current and former employees (“Plaintiffs”) of JPMorgan Chase & Co. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am by jonathanturley
While largely lost in election day coverage, United States District Judge James Boasberg dismissed the much heralded case of retired Army Lt. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:15 am by John Stigi
Jan. 29, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the short-swing profits rule imposed by Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Sept. 17, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed claims by Nigerian citizens against various multinational oil producers under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]).Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on their account stated counterclaim, as their claim for legal fees is intertwined with plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
Dow Canada argued that under the “stream-of-commerce plus” test first developed by the Supreme Court in Asahi Metal Industries Co., Ltd. v. [read post]