Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 4,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm by Ben Sperry
United States could have an impact on statutory construction going forward. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Henry Barrett
Many point to the European Union as a bastion for ‘third way’ media co-regulation—balancing China’s authoritarian grip on expression and the United States’ unrestricted accommodations for free speech. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Zaid is a Washington, D.C. national security attorney who has spent three decades handling cases involving classified information, security clearances, war crimes, terrorism and the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:46 pm by Kristen Eichensehr
IEEPA authorizes the President to exercise a plethora of emergency powers whenever he declares a national emergency “to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
To date, the UN system has not developed sufficient structures or tools to further reinforce implementation support, including systematic data gathering, wide-ranging capacity-building, or a global “help desk” for businesses, States, civil society and other stakeholders. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Bruno Aiub (Monark) and State Prosecution Office (São Paulo, MPSP) v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]