Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 3,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 2:55 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miskovic & Anor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Civ 16 (20 January 2011) Swain- Masonn & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2011] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2011) Rohlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 18 (20 January 2011) Bellway Homes Ltd v Beazer Homes Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2011) Crema v Cenkos Securities Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 10 (20 January… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Tyukody and Horowitz are Co-Chairs of Greenberg Traurig, LLP’s Securities Litigation Practice. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
A state’s duties under the Convention to a refugee reaching a particular territory for whose international relations the state is responsible are in principle and in normal circumstances limited to providing and securing the refugee’s Convention rights in that context [89]. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that… [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]