Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 3,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:02 am by April Rolen-Ogden and Michael Ishee
BPX Operating Co., et al. sued the unit operator for breach of contract to recover transportation costs incurred as a result of alleged regulatory violations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) Shipper-Must-Have-Title policy. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The defendants invite us to assert the "judicial Power of the United States" over a matter that belongs to the states. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Centre for Internet and Society blog has published an analysis of Peiter “Mudge” Zatko’s whistleblower complaint with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, filed in July 2022, which accuses the platform of serious security failings. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am by OLF
Standard Insurance Company, Case No. 20-cv-2449, decided by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on August 19, 2022. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm by Anna Bower
” This is the former president of the United States, he says. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]