Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 3,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
Specifically, Triton had agreed to become co-obligor on Rice’s debt to Glaser Weil, and Rice had also pledged his interest in Triton to Glaser Weil as security on his debt. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:24 pm by Matthew Guariglia
And yet the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) asserts the power to freely search the electronic devices of travelers before allowing them entrance into, or exit from, the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-392Issue: (1) Whether, in the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to a judicial campaign, the McCormick v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:03 am by Linda S. Mullenix
   Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
She co-authored an amicus brief for scholars of immigration law on the history of the Immigration and Nationality Act in support of Hawaii in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am by Peter Margulies
The denial cited an unspecified national security ground in the INA, which contains a plethora of terrorism-related grounds for denying admission to the United States. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am by Adam Wagner
When applying for an interim injunction, an applicant need only show that they have a “good arguable claim“; the hearing is not intended to represent a full hearing of the merits of the case (see American Cyanamid Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 11:32 am by Conaway & Strickler, P.C.
United States, a case that could have significant implications on the future of federal white-collar prosecutions. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]