Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 4,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 6:36 am
A federal securities class action was filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
On appeal to the United States Supreme Court ("SCt") was the following :16-373 CA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT V. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:07 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States of America v. 15.919 Acres of Land (More or Less) by Susie Cagle, Special to ProPublica. [read post]
On February 22, 2023, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Dapper Labs’ motion to dismiss, holding that although “it is a close call and the Court’s decision is narrow,” Moments NFTs qualify as securities under the Howey test, the four-pronged test created by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Derek J. Lindenschmidt
Interestingly, although the bill may be inextricably linked with General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
On July 25, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the much-anticipated ruling on class certification in Erica P. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 10:36 am by Blake Osborn
Just before the clock struck 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit weighed in on the constitutionality of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC” or “Commission”) administrative law judges. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]