Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
Under this line of reasoning, anyone selling foreign securities in the United States and closing the transaction in the United States could escape application of the antifraud provisions. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
" Instead, the Second Circuit held that courts must carefully consider the facts and circumstances of each case to avoid the very result that the Supreme Court had hoped to prevent in Morrison: promiscuous application of the U.S. securities laws to transactions that have little, if any, relationship to the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:00 am
The New York Court of Appeals recently answered the following question certified from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Rosenberg v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:03 am
(Opinion on Petition For Rehearing, United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, 14-3983,09-4414-cv, January 30, 2015). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:03 am
See Warner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:24 am
Burris, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:04 am
Georgie Court of Appeals Reverses Leggett v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 6:36 am
A federal securities class action was filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, against Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
On appeal to the United States Supreme Court ("SCt") was the following :16-373 CA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT V. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:35 am
Father responded that Child would be staying in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:07 pm
United States of America v. 15.919 Acres of Land (More or Less) by Susie Cagle, Special to ProPublica. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
On February 22, 2023, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Dapper Labs’ motion to dismiss, holding that although “it is a close call and the Court’s decision is narrow,” Moments NFTs qualify as securities under the Howey test, the four-pronged test created by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on February 27 issued its decision in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
§ 1514A; Lawson v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:51 pm
On May 5, 2015, in Kelly v. [read post]
