Search for: "Security Savings Bank v. California" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions.  [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 11:19 pm by Mike
On June 12, 2006 Plaintiff and World Savings Bank entered into a refinance loan secured by a deed of trust on his property. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:29 am by Diane Drain
  They lost their homes, their savings and their family security because a bank felt they could ignore the law. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
appeared first on CALIFORNIA CORPORATE & SECURITIES LAW. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Claudia told Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle that the bank was nice enough to contact her attorney the day before the sale to offer her the chance to save her home by agreeing to a higher monthly payment. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 11:42 am by Lisa Yun and Alejandro Moreno
In Jones, plaintiffs obtained a loan from Wachovia Bank’s predecessor secured by their residence. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
On the day plaintiff signed the loan documents, Pham deposited $4,500 in plaintiff's bank account and later asked plaintiff for a bank receipt showing the balance in her account. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
Kidde, 2014 WL 703514 (California Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 10:23 pm
College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999)]Hmmm, that gets to the legalities but doesn't address what the WSJ was talking about.First, some background (from the Supreme Court decision):Since 1987, respondent College Savings Bank, a New Jersey chartered savings bank located in Princeton, New Jersey, has marketed and sold certificates of deposit known as the CollegeSure CD, which are essentially annuity contracts for financing future college… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:34 am by John Jascob
The court held in a 5-4 vote that American Pipe’s equitable tolling rule is unavailable to save an individual suit filed outside the three-year repose period contained in Securities Act Section 13. [read post]