Search for: "Security Savings Bank v. California" Results 41 - 60 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm by Vassi Iliadis and Michael Maddigan
Bank of America, N.A., 57 Cal. 4th 390, 393 (2013) (allowing “unlawful” UCL claim for violations of the federal Truth in Savings Act despite no express private right of action because Congress intended for state laws to hold banks to equivalent standards); see also Zhang v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 2:44 pm by Vassi Iliadis and Michael Maddigan
Bank of America, N.A., 57 Cal. 4th 390, 393 (2013) (allowing “unlawful” UCL claim for violations of the federal Truth in Savings Act despite no express private right of action because Congress intended for state laws to hold banks to equivalent standards); see also Zhang v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Actavis[18] and concurring in California Dental Association v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
  Under the Custody Rule, if a registered investment adviser has custody of “client funds or securities”, then it must maintain those client assets with a qualified custodian (generally a bank, broker-dealer, FCM or other financial institution), subject to certain exceptions. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
  Under the Custody Rule, if a registered investment adviser has custody of “client funds or securities”, then it must maintain those client assets with a qualified custodian (generally a bank, broker-dealer, FCM or other financial institution), subject to certain exceptions. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:34 am by John Jascob
The court held in a 5-4 vote that American Pipe’s equitable tolling rule is unavailable to save an individual suit filed outside the three-year repose period contained in Securities Act Section 13. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
 (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 1462, 1477, quoting Western Security Bank v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The California Channel does not appear to have any express policy permitting unlicensed use for any purpose.] [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Charbonneau, 2016 BCSC 625 https://t.co/t62ypQ9IHB -> Interim injunction in patent case refused in University of California v. [read post]