Search for: "Security Savings Bank v. California" Results 61 - 80 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am by Eugene Volokh
The California Channel does not appear to have any express policy permitting unlicensed use for any purpose.] [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Charbonneau, 2016 BCSC 625 -> Interim injunction in patent case refused in University of California v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:42 am
The court also explains that Holmes later testified that when she was reviewing Lichtenberger's laptop, she viewed approximately 100 images of child pornography saved in several subfolders inside a folder entitled `private. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On October 17, 2013, when Northern District of Illinois Judge Ronald Guzman entered a $2.46 billion judgment for the plaintiffs in the long-running Household International securities class action lawsuit, it was according to statements at the time the largest judgment ever in a securities fraud trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Hyde Park Savings Bank, 14-116 (addressing appealability in a bankruptcy proceeding)). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
CLS Bank International Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am by Bill Ward
See Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Banks), and public employees keen to speak about official (mis)conduct (Garcetti v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
Kidde, 2014 WL 703514 (California Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
And while the private sector is probably cheaper, it remains to be seen whether the cost savings is on the order of 15% (respectable) or on the order of 3% (somewhat negligible). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Target has a duty under the data breach security notification laws in 46 states, to provide prompt notice of the security breach to affected customers. [read post]