Search for: "Security Savings Bank v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Target has a duty under the data breach security notification laws in 46 states, to provide prompt notice of the security breach to affected customers. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am by Mandelman
 Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Hyde Park Savings Bank, 14-116 (addressing appealability in a bankruptcy proceeding)). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
On appeal to the Supreme Court, AT&T argued that the FAA preempted the unconscionably finding, despite the savings clause, as California law discriminated against arbitration clauses in violation of the FAA. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:06 pm
Requires federal banking regulators to establish incentives for the development and maintenance of “green banking centers” for the purpose of providing information to customers seeking information about acquiring green mortgages. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:51 am by Kristian Soltes
Epic Antitrust Judge Doubts Apple Expert’s Amex ComparisonLaw360 – May 12, 2021 (subscription required) A California federal judge presiding over Epic’s high-stakes antitrust trial appeared skeptical Wednesday of a professor’s testimony that Apple’s anti-steering provisions are akin to restrictions upheld by the high court in Ohio v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
AlJazeera had an article “Surveillance will not save us from COVID-19”. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 45-48(1987) (other statutory sections; legislative history).California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. [read post]