Search for: "Segura v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
This was established in the case of Nichols v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:55 am
Specifically, an argument can be advanced based upon Segura v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:05 pm
Segura-Baltazar. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
This post will discuss the independent source exception, particularly the United States Supreme Court cases of Segura v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984); see also the later case of Murray v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
” Segura v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
Although the exclusionary rule applies to “primary evidence obtained as a direct result of an illegal search or seizure” as stated in Segura v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:14 am
Although the exclusionary rule applies to “primary evidence obtained as a direct result of an illegal search or seizure” as stated in Segura v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
In 1984, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
