Search for: "Sell v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 5,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 5:56 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), the Supreme Court held that post-trial juror testimony that, during trial, jurors were falling asleep, drinking alcohol, and using and selling drugs was inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which... [read post]
Majority Opinion In its June 22, 2015, opinion, the United States Supreme Court rejected the Ninth Circuit’s primary reasoning by an 8-1 margin. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
She alleged that Beekman's offering plan described its stated intent to sell the 65 units. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:15 am by Zachary Silbersher
That creates an ostensibly easy way for companies selling technological components to claim they are neither making nor selling any product in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 6:33 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Kennedale insurance lawyers need to read this recent opinion from the United States District Court, Dallas Division. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued an important opinion in the case of Rosemond v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 5:45 am
Before the patent trial between Apple and Samsung began, the district court issued a preliminary injunction against Samsung from making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing into the United States, Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the federal government’s challenge to Arizona’s aggressive efforts to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in that state.  [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by KLIBlogsAdmin
Buy More, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 15-56544, 27 June 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Copyright Blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by KLIBlogsAdmin
Buy More, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 15-56544, 27 June 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Copyright Blog. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:01 am by Dennis Crouch
“In order for an offer to sell to constitute infringement, the offer must be to sell a patented invention within the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States: (1) Whether a gun buyer’s intent to sell a firearm to another lawful buyer in the future a fact is “material to the lawfulness of the... [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Earlier this summer, the district court enjoined Samsung from "making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing into the United States, Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer, and any product that is no more than colorably different from this specified product and embodies any design contained in U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]