Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 181 - 200 of 5,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
”[6] In essence, Canada argued that Article 3.A.2.11(b) did not prevent Canada from establishing “pools” of TRQ exclusively processors and also pointed to the fact that non-processors do have some access to TRQ.[7] Canada also argued that the United States position was based on an incorrect understanding of the operation of the supply management system and role that processors play—as both purchasers and sellers of dairy products, they “help guard against both… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 6:55 pm by Larry
More to the point of Amcord Flexibles Kreuzlingen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
., Boor, and Edson also warranted that the “Patents, Know-How and/or Intellectual Property Rights constitute all of the intellectual property used in or necessary to conduct the business of manufacturing and selling plastic roofing shingles as conducted and as currently planned to be conducted by Seller or any other entity owned and/or controlled by Seller. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
It was the last state to adopt economic nexus standards for its sales tax in the wake of the South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Binz and Graham studied the returns of investment portfolios that owned stock in companies that announced earnings increases and those that were short sellers in stock that announced earnings decreases and found that these returns were higher after the Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  On February 3, 2022, Bonitas Research, a short seller, published a report about MP Materials. [read post]