Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 221 - 240 of 5,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 1:59 pm
The issue here, somewhat similar to that discussed recently by the Florida Supreme Court in the case of DK Arena, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am by Deirdre Kennedy
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:53 am by Steven G. Pearl
The seller has filed a petition for review, and I assume that the California Supreme Court will grant and hold pending its decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:35 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaOpinion Date: 9/1/09Cite: Movie Gallery US, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:40 am by Sheppard Mullin
Jenack Estate Appraisers & Auctioneers, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matos v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Last month, I blogged about the Chancery Court’s decision in Bardy Diagnostics v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
” There is no binding duty of the seller’s conveyancing solicitor to complete Part II of the Property Info Questionnaire.It is due to this case of William Sindall Plc -v- Cambridgeshire and the statement by the Law Society that we at Fridays endeavor to ensure that where a seller completes a Sellers Property Information form that we ask the Seller’s lawyer to complete a Sellers Property Information Form Part II. [read post]