Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2023, 9:13 am
See WBIP, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:29 am
Tortilla Factory, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:25 am
HomeLight, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONK. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Perma-Green Supreme, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:15 am
In September, we hosted a Constitution Day event with a presentation by Professor Samantha Barbas from the University at Buffalo on Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Difederico alleges as part of her proposed class action that Amazon entered into anticompetitive agreements with third-party sellers amounting to criminal price-fixing. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
Pareda (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/seller-forged-basquiats-and-harings-arrested-fraud-charges) United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Hamm v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
On August 24, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state-law securities claims in Kirschner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:00 am
Amazon, 2023 FC 1156 and Watson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm
Among the features that this new lawsuit has in common with many of the previously filed SPAC-related securities suits is the central importance to the lawsuit’s claims of allegations against the company first raised in a short-seller report. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
LPPAS Representative, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
In 2018, Brightstar—one of Harvestar’s biggest customers and a seller of refurbished phones—purchased a 51% controlling stock interest in Harvestar. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
That decision, SEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
The particular factors informing that decision were: the fact that that Amazon used a uniform method of presenting the offers published on its website, regardless of whether the goods advertised were its own or third party retailers’;the fact that it placed its own logo on all those advertisements; andthe fact that it offered third-party sellers additional services consisting of the storing and shipping of their goods.In the present case, the Court held that the Louboutin v… [read post]
