Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 321 - 340 of 5,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437 [2011]; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934, 938… [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:45 pm by Alison Fitzgerald and Meaghan Farrell
Indemnities Buyers may also wish to negotiate indemnities from sellers against losses related to modern slavery issues. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Hillel Y. Levin
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overruling Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:52 am by Chris Castle
Many of the same Big Tech services were parties to Web V but are now arguing against CPI for songwriters in Phonorecords IV. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Curliss v Adames, 2022 SKPC 26 (CanLII) [29] A fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of a seller can have an impact on the principle of caveat emptor. [read post]