Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm
Roy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
And indeed, the Munich I Regional Court confirmed to me the pendency of two German Sisvel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:54 am
., United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
But consider a second example, Lunney v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am
(Also, in Hepp v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:17 am
According to the FTC, where applicable law only allows recovery of costs and fees against the seller, the seller’s liability for costs and fees can be raised only against a holder because of the Holder Rule. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Not only would they be the seller/tenant in the transaction, but also the secured lender. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:36 pm
In the MetaBirkins case, Hermès v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:19 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:55 pm
” Likewise, Judge Orrick rejected the defendants’ contention that the Scorpion Capital article could not be relied upon to establish falsity, because it was written by a short-seller. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:03 am
Gil v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:31 am
” See U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:31 am
” See U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
He just wanted there to be a reliable registry.CAH: So sellers wanted to have a better idea of whether a mark they wanted to use was owned by someone else, but the 1905 Act's route to registering was needlessly complicated, not mandatory, and it didn't add any real incentive to entice trademark owners to register. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:20 am
See Postorivo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:37 am
Here is the complaint in Yakama Nation Tribal Council v. [read post]
