Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 41 - 60 of 5,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 9:49 am by Peter J. Cavanaugh
On June 17, 2009, Michigan Supreme Court entered an order affirming a 2008 Michigan Court of Appeals decision, which had held that Michigan law did not recognize claims for innocent misrepresentation under the Michigan Seller Disclosure Act (MCL 565.951, et seq).As we reported in an earlier posting (here), Roberts v Saffell involved a claim that Defendant Sellers failed to disclose a termite infestation in the home they sold to Plaintiff Buyers. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
  The RSIB states that the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (the “Commission”) “will not seek to enforce any sales or use tax collection obligation on remote sellers based on United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Richards Layton memo discusses the Chancery Court’s recent decision in Shareholder Representative Services v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) v. [read post]