Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 121 - 140 of 5,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm by Philip Segal
And check out our other blog, The Divorce Asset Hunter. [1] Meyer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  On January 6, 2022, The Bear Cave, a short seller, published a report entitled “Problems at Embark Technology. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The House of Bruar admitted infringement of the Amira boot, such that it was only the Regina boot that was at issue in the recent judgment of Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels in Fairfax & Favor v House of Bruar [2022] EWHC 689. [read post]