Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 121 - 140 of 5,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
This article is part of EFF’s investigation of location data brokers and Fog Data Science. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
  At all times relevant hereto, the Defendants were manufacturers and sellers of the adulterated food product that is the subject of the action. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am by Will Newman
Accordingly, the court held the buyer could not recover from the auctioneer.Cases like this highlight the importance of disclaimers by sellers and of due diligence by buyers.Twitter Issues Subpoenas in Dispute with Elon MuskThe Wall Street Journal quoted me in an article about the Twitter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
But the rightsholder asserted its rights against dashboard stickers without the background, including sending repeated takedown notices to Amazon targeting a rival seller. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
The absence of covenants explains the parties’ focus on good will and Justice Borrok’s reliance on the Court of Appeals’ 1981 opinion in Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler holding, on the one hand, that the seller of a company including its good will has an implied duty not to engage in solicitation impairing the company’s good will and, on the other hand, the seller has no general non-compete duty absent express agreement. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:31 am by Terry Hart
Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith, Brief for Respondents [PDF] — Goldsmith’s counsel this week filed its merits brief in the closely-watched Supreme Court copyright case. [read post]