Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 3,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 12:48 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0605, 2011 MT 59N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
In a release dated July 11, State Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger indicated that the sellers will be required to collect beginning on October 1, 2018 after the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:00 am by pvwlaw
North Dakota[1], states have to be careful about how they collect sales tax from remote sellers, otherwise they might violate the Constitution. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Riley Macdonald
Default Judgment Entered Against Seller of Nintendo Switch Jailbreak Nintendo of America Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
  The RSIB states that the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (the “Commission”) “will not seek to enforce any sales or use tax collection obligation on remote sellers based on United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Buckingham
A Q&A guide to remote sellers’ exposure to sales and use tax in Ohio after the US Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
And by a Decision & Order dated December 15, 2022, the AD1 determined that, pursuant to state law, the monies rightfully belonged to the party that paid the tax. [read post]