Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 3,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
In a release dated July 11, State Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger indicated that the sellers will be required to collect beginning on October 1, 2018 after the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:00 am by pvwlaw
North Dakota[1], states have to be careful about how they collect sales tax from remote sellers, otherwise they might violate the Constitution. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
  The RSIB states that the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (the “Commission”) “will not seek to enforce any sales or use tax collection obligation on remote sellers based on United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:10 am by Buckingham
A Q&A guide to remote sellers’ exposure to sales and use tax in Ohio after the US Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Kyle White
In some states, the fact that a seller is merely a “pass through” seller or a “broker” may absolve the seller of liability under a product liability theory. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Buckingham
A Q&A guide to remote sellers’ exposure to sales and use tax in Ohio after the US Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]