Search for: "Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by Nathan Mannebach (US)
In a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) allowed registration of the following design mark for “Casinos,” in International Class 41, and “Hotel, restaurant, and bar services,” in International Class 43 on behalf of the Seminole Tribe of Florida (“Applicant”): In re Seminole Tribe of Fla., 2023 TTAB LEXIS 184 (TTAB May 25, 2023). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by Nathan Mannebach (US)
In a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) allowed registration of the following design mark for “Casinos,” in International Class 41, and “Hotel, restaurant, and bar services,” in International Class 43 on behalf of the Seminole Tribe of Florida (“Applicant”): In re Seminole Tribe of Fla., 2023 TTAB LEXIS 184 (TTAB May 25, 2023). [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 8:23 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, we went astray in Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313 (1934), and Article I likewise declines to grant Congress an enumerated power to do so, see Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. [read post]