Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2025, 10:33 am
(Maybe these are the sorts of "consequences" Seth Barrett Tillman worried about.) [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:55 am
Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) have posted Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part V: The Elector Incompatibility, Impeachment Disqualification, Incompatibility, and Foreign Emoluments Clauses (63(3) S. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part V: The Elector Incompatibility, Impeachment Disqualification, Incompatibility, and Foreign Emoluments Clauses, 63(3) S. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:04 am
Yesterday, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote, "Who knows what else the final few hours will bring? [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 1:43 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] In the waning days of the Biden presidency, there has been a flurry of new Executive Branch decisions with constitutional implications. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:40 am
I am happy to publish this guest post from my frequent co-author Seth Barrett Tillman, which is cross-posted at Seth's blog. *** If you ask me about whether or not the President has an implied constitutionally-granted power to remove high-level Executive Branch officers subject to his (the President's) appointment power, my answer is basically that I do not have a dog in that fight. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I also did not take a position on this question. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
As I recall, Seth Barrett Tillman was the first person to raise the Scalia opinion in late December 2016. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 3:53 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed this provision in Part IV of our ten-part series. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 9:24 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I responded that the President's exercise of discretion to not take certain action was not itself insurrection. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 1:40 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman highlighted a passage from Judge Wynn's concurrence in the Emoluments Clauses en banc decision: Without a doubt, a lawsuit brought by the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia against the President of the United States catches attention outside the walls of the courthouse. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 10:15 am
For those interested in reading further, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discuss the sword-shield dichotomy in Sweeping and Forcing (pp. 389–404); see also Anderson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 6:05 pm
Barnett & Josh Blackman Major Questions Avoidance and Anti-Avoidance by Daniel J. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:33 pm
But rest assured, there is one person who wrote about these issues before anyone cared: Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
19 Oct 2024, 10:31 pm
His name is Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 2:40 pm
Our brief was filed on behalf of Robert Ray, Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, and the Landmark Legal Foundation. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
For sure, Barrett was not among them, as she would tell us in her concurrence. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 2:42 pm
[I am happy to share this guest post from Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, which addresses some discourse on legal academia, including a recent post by Will Baude.] [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:29 am
Trump (Seth Barrett Tillman & Josh Blackman, 2024 Harv. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I explain why the holding of Nixon, whatever it is, was limited to some "unique" facts—which is precisely what the decision repeatedly stated.) [read post]