Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 181 - 193
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
[DOJ’s Schrödinger’s Briefs in the Emoluments Clauses litigation are in tension with a 2009 OLC Opinion] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] In a recent post, we explained that the Congressional Research Service ("CRS") has shifted its position concerning the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman and I weighed in on those debates. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Graber, Their Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 and Ours, Just Security (Feb. 16, 2021) James Wagstaffe, Time to Reconsider the 14th Amendment for Trump’s Role in the Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 11, 2021) Media and Other Resources … [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
I think Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman are more likely right than not. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm
However, a number of prominent commentators and legal scholars claim otherwise, including former attorney general Michael Mukasey, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, and—most recently – Steve Calabresi. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
As my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained on the Volokh Conspiracy (Parts 6, 7, and 8), our official-versus-individual capacity argument is likely the only thing standing between President Trump and a discovery order. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It seems likely that if and when President Trump is put on trial in the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors, his lawyers will argue that the president was exercising his First Amendment right to free speech in the weeks after the election—and, as a consequence, his words cannot form the basis of an impeachable offense. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
