Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm by NCC Staff
Trump lawsuits on behalf of another legal scholar, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Additional details and application instructions.ICYMI: Annette Gordon Reed's writing routines; Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, Yes, Trump Can Accept Gifts, New York Times, July 13, 2017. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
Trump lawsuit on behalf of another law professor, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:57 am by SHG
Somebody owes somebody an apology here, but if I was Josh Blackman or Seth Tillman, I wouldn’t hold my breath. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
” The other one (Blackman) was persuaded by this research some years ago, long before the notion of a President Trump was even conceivable. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:10 pm by Victoria Clark
Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman questioned whether special counsel Robert Mueller is an “officer” or “employee” of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am by Lana Ulrich
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:00 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Seth Barrett Tillman, law lecturer at Maynooth University, adds that Congress also has power at stake in the debate—specifically, its power “to inform itself and to maintain exclusive control over access to its physical facilities. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
As my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained on the Volokh Conspiracy (Parts 6, 7, and 8), our official-versus-individual capacity argument is likely the only thing standing between President Trump and a discovery order. [read post]