Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 21 - 40
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
” Tillman filed an amicus brief in support of Trump with Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Not exactly what I expected, but a very rewarding experience. ] As regular readers will know, Seth Barrett Tillman and I have spent untold hours over the past six months, and really past three years, on Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am
Seth Barrett Tillman) is available here.The post C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Griswold On Behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman (1/9/24). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
Both Seth Barrett Tillman and I will be attending. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
See Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321, 421 (2022) (concluding that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are "Officers" for purposes of the Succession Clause, and can succeed to the presidency.) [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
See Seth Barrett Tillman, Why Our Next President May Keep His or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture on the Constitution's Incompatibility Clause, 4 Duke J. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
Congratulations to Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman for unearthing the Louisville Daily Journal's series of pieces claiming, contrary to what President Andrew Johnson said about his job description, that Johnson was not an officer of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
Congratulations to Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman for unearthing the Louisville Daily Journal’s series of pieces claiming, contrary to what President Andrew Johnson said about his job description, that Johnson was not an officer of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] In our view, the phrase "Officers of the United States" does not refer to the President. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:36 pm
Griswold On Behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
