Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
I see little downside for the Senate to send such a communication I thank my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman for offering this suggestion. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
" I flagged this possibility in a post earlier this week: My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
” The other one (Blackman) was persuaded by this research some years ago, long before the notion of a President Trump was even conceivable. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:10 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman questioned whether special counsel Robert Mueller is an “officer” or “employee” of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I offered a similar observation on Lawfare last month. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay on Lawfare. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
Gilbert Stuart’s “Portrait of George Washington. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, law lecturer at Maynooth University, adds that Congress also has power at stake in the debate—specifically, its power “to inform itself and to maintain exclusive control over access to its physical facilities. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:02 am
[Resolutions to approve the acceptance of foreign gifts and emoluments must be presented to the President] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
