Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay on Lawfare. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about this issue a decade ago in a paper, fittingly titled, "The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Josh Blackman is Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:55 am
(See Seth Barrett Tillman's excellent article). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:30 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new piece on Balkinization about the Puerto Rico Appointments Clause case. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases] [This post was co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, we posed three questions concerning the characterization of presidential electors. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
Gilbert Stuart’s “Portrait of George Washington. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a lengthy post on this case in July 2019. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:44 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I had similar concerns after oral arguments. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
In November 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained our disagreement with the Amars in The Atlantic. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, law lecturer at Maynooth University, adds that Congress also has power at stake in the debate—specifically, its power “to inform itself and to maintain exclusive control over access to its physical facilities. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, the en banc Fourth Circuit decided two related cases in the Foreign Emoluments Clause litigation. [read post]
