Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 121 - 140
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay on Lawfare. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
[If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment. ] [This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Over the past four years, we have defended many of President Trump's actions as a constitutional matter, while criticizing those actions as a policy matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman maintain that the persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment thought that only Congress could implement Section 3 (“Only the Feds Could Disqualify Madison Cawthorn and Majorie Taylor Greene,” New York Times, April 20, 2022). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Josh Blackman is Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In the Emoluments Clauses litigation, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the methodology to consider post-ratification history. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
Gilbert Stuart’s “Portrait of George Washington. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about this issue a decade ago in a paper, fittingly titled, "The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 11:20 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I responded with declarations from experts who have authenticated Hamilton's signature. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
["The President Has Three Bodies and There Is No Cause of Action for Ultra Vires Conduct"] The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy has published the new article I co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman: "The Unresolved Threshold Issues in the Emoluments Clauses Litigation: The President Has Three Bodies and There Is No Cause of Action for Ultra Vires Conduct. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:30 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new piece on Balkinization about the Puerto Rico Appointments Clause case. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:55 am
(See Seth Barrett Tillman's excellent article). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
[Justice Thomas: “constitutional rights are generally invoked defensively in cases arising under other sources of law, or asserted offensively pursuant to an independent cause of action designed for that purpose”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I have described the basis for equitable jurisdiction in Young in very similar terms: In Young, the government was regulating the railroad company. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about it here. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
