Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman" Results 141 - 160 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2021, 11:13 am by Josh Blackman
Earlier this year, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an essay for the Illinois Law Review on President Biden's first 100 days. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases] [This post was co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, we posed three questions concerning the characterization of presidential electors. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
"] In May, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed on Lawfare whether the President was an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote in early 2020 that even if Trump were convicted of violating this statute, he could not be disqualified from serving a second term as President. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am by Josh Blackman
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm by Josh Blackman
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am by Josh Blackman
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
See Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321, 421 (2022) (concluding that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are "Officers" for purposes of the Succession Clause, and can succeed to the presidency.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Tillman filed an amicus brief in support of Trump with Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm by Josh Blackman
In November 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained our disagreement with the Amars in The Atlantic. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am by Josh Blackman
Presumably, some of the signatories agree with me and my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman that the First Amendment does apply–or at least has some relevance–to impeachment proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm by Josh Blackman
During President Trump's second impeachment trial, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote that elected officials, including the President, retained their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am by Guest Blogger
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman            During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am by Josh Blackman
 ] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization titled "The Enforcement Act of 1870: Disqualification Myths and Realities. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:03 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman analyzed various arguments for Trump’s motion to move the New York State prosecution against him to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. [read post]