Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman" Results 141 - 160 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2022, 8:02 am by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an article about two phrases in Section 3: "officer of the United States" and "office . . . under the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
, 2021 University of Illinois Law Review Online 190 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:13 am by Josh Blackman
Earlier this year, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an essay for the Illinois Law Review on President Biden's first 100 days. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
[Seth Barrett Tillman and I discuss whether President Trump can be disqualified from a second term pursuant to Section 3.] [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:26 am by Josh Blackman
In the Atlantic, Seth Barrett Tillman and I expressed our disagreement with the Amars. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am by Guest Blogger
Josh Blackman is Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 12:50 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) has posted Defining a Theory of 'Bribery' for Impeachment (Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Defining a Theory of 'Bribery' for Impeachment, Lawfare: Hard National Security... [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Howard Bashman
“Defining a Theory of ‘Bribery’ for Impeachment”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:15 am by Steve Lubet
Over at Balkinization, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a long post addressing an unlikely problem: “Could Justice Thomas Preside over President Trump’s Impeachment Trial? [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am by Guest Blogger
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman            During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:17 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Check out Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman's piece at The Volokh Conspiracy on why the federal courts lack equitable jurisdiction in the border wall funding case and the emoluments challenge. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 6:09 pm by Robin Effron
Seth Barrett Tillman (Maynooth University) and Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law) have posted What is the Plaintiff's Cause of Action in the Wall Litigation to the Volokh Conspiracy blog hosted at reason.com. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Howard Bashman
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a post titled “What is the Plaintiffs’ Cause of Action in the Wall Litigation? [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Harris, Bloomberg, Washington Post; two views at Volokh Conspiracy from David Post and Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman; earlier on Emoluments Clause litigation] Last year I noted the hotel-competitor fact pattern as the kind of emoluments case most likely to clear the standing hurdle; Excessive fines are unconstitutional, whether levied on persons or on groups of persons [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere and Dave Kopel on Cato/Independence… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 9:10 am by Steven D. Schwinn
For yet a different take on Mueller's constitutionality, check out Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman's piece on Lawfare, Is Robert Mueller an "Officer of the United States" or an "Employee of the United States? [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"ICYMI: Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman on Lawfare: Is Robert Mueller an “Officer of the United States” or an “Employee of the United States”? [read post]