Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman" Results 181 - 200 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Hat tip: Legal Scholarship BlogOriginalism All Around: Seth Barrett Tillman engages with Zephyr Teachout on the Foreign Emoluments Clause; Ilya Somin puzzles out how to square originalism with pervasive "political ignorance"; and Steven G. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
Trump lawsuit on behalf of another law professor, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman and I address this issue in our new article, Is the President an 'Officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment?. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Gordon Ahl
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Akhil Reed Amar makes an interesting argument that the Act is unconstitutional, though this has been disputed by Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The issues have, if anything, intensified with the election of Donald Trump, and the Foreign Emoluments Clause has become a hot topic, as evidenced by Professor Zephyr Teachout’s op-ed [and Professor Seth Barrett Tillman’s counterpoint] in yesterday’s New York Times. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm by Tia Sewell
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
I thank Adam Liptak and the NYTimes for bringing up this interesting matter./3 — Seth Barrett Tillman (@SethBTillman) November 25, 2019 [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
[Co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two faithless elector cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm by Ilya Somin
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:49 am by Jay Wexler
  Instead of researching the issue myself, I asked Seth Barrett Tillman, one of the premier experts on many of the Constitution's odd clauses, what he thought of the matter, and he told me that "today . . . there is an incompatibility between being a Senator/Representative and a commissioned officer in the National Guard. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
["The President Has Three Bodies and There Is No Cause of Action for Ultra Vires Conduct"] The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy has published the new article I co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman: "The Unresolved Threshold Issues in the Emoluments Clauses Litigation: The President Has Three Bodies and There Is No Cause of Action for Ultra Vires Conduct. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:59 am by Josh Blackman
I criticized this bill in a post I co-authored for Lawfare with my colleague, Seth Barrett Tillman, Lecturer at the Maynooth University Department of Law in Ireland. [read post]