Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 221 - 240
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 8:56 pm
In conjunction with this colloquy, we republished a series of essays by Seth Barrett Tillman and Brian C. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
Congratulations to Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman for unearthing the Louisville Daily Journal’s series of pieces claiming, contrary to what President Andrew Johnson said about his job description, that Johnson was not an officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
I, along with my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman, contend that the President is not an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
Maynooth University Department of Law Lecturer Seth Barrett Tillman further makes this point in a brief letter he sent to the Globe: Deans Minow and Tacha wrote that “President Obama [has a] clear constitutional duty to nominate a successor” to Scalia. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman maintain that the persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment thought that only Congress could implement Section 3 (“Only the Feds Could Disqualify Madison Cawthorn and Majorie Taylor Greene,” New York Times, April 20, 2022). [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:57 am
Moreover, they claim that amicus Seth Barrett Tillman, represented by Josh, concealed this from the court, claiming that it wasn’t signed by Hamilton. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 4:40 pm
Pildes (University of Chicago Law Forum Forthcoming) Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part III: The Appointments, Impeachment, Commissions, and Oath or Affirmation Clauses by Seth Barrett Tillman & Josh Blackman (62 South Texas Law Review 349 (2023)) Bill of Rights Nondelegation by Eli Nachmany (49 Brigham Young University Law Review forthcoming) The Death of Administrative… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
" I flagged this possibility in a post earlier this week: My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm
Trump lawsuit on behalf of another law professor, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Hat tip: Legal Scholarship BlogOriginalism All Around: Seth Barrett Tillman engages with Zephyr Teachout on the Foreign Emoluments Clause; Ilya Somin puzzles out how to square originalism with pervasive "political ignorance"; and Steven G. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I address this issue in our new article, Is the President an 'Officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment?. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman claim that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the U.S. president. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
Akhil Reed Amar makes an interesting argument that the Act is unconstitutional, though this has been disputed by Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
As Seth Barrett Tillman points out, Noel Canning clearly precludes such an appointment. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:15 pm
The issues have, if anything, intensified with the election of Donald Trump, and the Foreign Emoluments Clause has become a hot topic, as evidenced by Professor Zephyr Teachout’s op-ed [and Professor Seth Barrett Tillman’s counterpoint] in yesterday’s New York Times. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
