Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 261 - 280
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In the Emoluments Clauses litigation, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the methodology to consider post-ratification history. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I have written quite a bit about whether parties can seek affirmative relief under the Constitution in the absence of a federal cause of action. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 9:24 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I responded that the President's exercise of discretion to not take certain action was not itself insurrection. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm
During President Trump's second impeachment trial, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote that elected officials, including the President, retained their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Hawaii was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, What Court (If Any) Decided Ex Parte Merryman? [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm
" In a series of amicus briefs, Seth Barrett Tillman and I contended that these "official capacity" suits were not proper. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 1:40 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman highlighted a passage from Judge Wynn's concurrence in the Emoluments Clauses en banc decision: Without a doubt, a lawsuit brought by the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia against the President of the United States catches attention outside the walls of the courthouse. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman addressed this argument in September. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
But Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman made a fair historical and textual case that elected officials were not “officers,” and that included the president and vice president. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
For sure, Barrett was not among them, as she would tell us in her concurrence. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 4:51 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about such proposed plea bargains here. [read post]
11 May 2025, 8:58 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the gift in Part V of our ten-part series. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Nebraska, Justice Barrett rejected the validity of substantive cannons altogether. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
But Cf. the various works of Seth Barrett Tillman, who argues in a number of articles that a full Congress now could delegate to a post-attack Congress the power to enact legislation through only one house (the Senate, reconstituted via appointments) in the interim. ** There is an open question of constitutional quorums here. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I explain why the holding of Nixon, whatever it is, was limited to some "unique" facts—which is precisely what the decision repeatedly stated.) [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 10:33 am
(Maybe these are the sorts of "consequences" Seth Barrett Tillman worried about.) [read post]
