Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 261 - 280
of 292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Nebraska, Justice Barrett rejected the validity of substantive cannons altogether. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
But Cf. the various works of Seth Barrett Tillman, who argues in a number of articles that a full Congress now could delegate to a post-attack Congress the power to enact legislation through only one house (the Senate, reconstituted via appointments) in the interim. ** There is an open question of constitutional quorums here. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote in early 2020 that even if Trump were convicted of violating this statute, he could not be disqualified from serving a second term as President. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Graber, Their Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 and Ours, Just Security (Feb. 16, 2021) James Wagstaffe, Time to Reconsider the 14th Amendment for Trump’s Role in the Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 11, 2021) Media and Other Resources … [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I explain why the holding of Nixon, whatever it is, was limited to some "unique" facts—which is precisely what the decision repeatedly stated.) [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
At the time, Seth Barrett Tillman and I acknowledged the easy case: the President receiving a "suitcase full of money" in exchange for performing some official act would amount to bribery. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm
However, a number of prominent commentators and legal scholars claim otherwise, including former attorney general Michael Mukasey, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, and—most recently – Steve Calabresi. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
[Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh argue they do, in defense of--checks notes--Steven Donziger.] [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Rosen’s article, Funding “Non-Traditional” Military Operations: The Alluring Myth of A Presidential Power of the Purse, was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, Ex Parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, 224 Mil. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
Last week Senator Dick Durbin invited Chief Justice Roberts to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
I think Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman are more likely right than not. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
Klasfeld’s reporting is part of Just Security’s Trump Trials Clearinghouse. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It seems likely that if and when President Trump is put on trial in the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors, his lawyers will argue that the president was exercising his First Amendment right to free speech in the weeks after the election—and, as a consequence, his words cannot form the basis of an impeachable offense. [read post]
