Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 281 - 300
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
Barrett does not explain. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
[I sign off from the internet for 25 hours every week. ] Tablet Magazine's profile of Seth Barrett Tillman provided a peak inside our working relationship. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
In 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote about what would happen if Chief Justice Roberts was unable or unwilling to serve at an impeachment trial. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
[The first two installments of a planned ten-part series that provides the first comprehensive examination of the offices and officers of the Constitution. ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I have published the first two installments of our planned ten-part series that provides the first comprehensive examination of the offices and officers of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Since the outset of the Section 3 litigation, those seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot have made two primary arguments concerning the Appointments Clause. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am
Responding to an analysis by Hilary Hurd and Benjamin Wittes Seth Barrett Tillman argued that Senate rules do not require a full trial, and do not equate “removal” with “disqualification. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Thanks to Seth Barrett Tillman for the pointer. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
"I got there via "A Letter to Professor John McWhorter" by Seth Barrett Tillman, who writes:We (Americans) have had many talented wordsmiths in the White House. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
” For an argument to this effect see Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3, 28 Tex. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, a New York native who teaches law at Maynooth University School of Law in Kildare, Ireland, has been thinking and writing about some of the issues around Section 3 since at least 2014, including his view that the president is not “an officer of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
