Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman" Results 281 - 300 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am by Jeremy Gordon
Responding to an analysis by Hilary Hurd and Benjamin Wittes Seth Barrett Tillman argued that Senate rules do not require a full trial, and do not equate “removal” with “disqualification. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
"I got there via "A Letter to Professor John McWhorter" by Seth Barrett Tillman, who writes:We (Americans) have had many talented wordsmiths in the White House. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, a New York native who teaches law at Maynooth University School of Law in Kildare, Ireland, has been thinking and writing about some of the issues around Section 3 since at least 2014, including his view that the president is not “an officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am by Josh Blackman
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm by Josh Blackman
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am by Josh Blackman
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:43 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Seth Barrett Tillman has presented strong evidence of the allowance of business dealings from Washington’s public conduct in relation to the domestic emoluments clause.) [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm by Josh Blackman
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have offered the president some solace. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm by Josh Blackman
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
, 2021 University of Illinois Law Review Online 190 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
In the Emoluments Clauses litigation, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the  methodology to consider post-ratification history. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm by Josh Blackman
In November 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained our disagreement with the Amars in The Atlantic. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am by Josh Blackman
Presumably, some of the signatories agree with me and my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman that the First Amendment does apply–or at least has some relevance–to impeachment proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm by Josh Blackman
During President Trump's second impeachment trial, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote that elected officials, including the President, retained their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]