Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 281 - 300
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argued that while the new Abuse of the Pardon Prevention Act may seem like a wise idea in the current moment, it would prove dangerous for the future of American politics. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Thanks to Seth Barrett Tillman for the pointer. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am
Responding to an analysis by Hilary Hurd and Benjamin Wittes Seth Barrett Tillman argued that Senate rules do not require a full trial, and do not equate “removal” with “disqualification. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
"I got there via "A Letter to Professor John McWhorter" by Seth Barrett Tillman, who writes:We (Americans) have had many talented wordsmiths in the White House. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, a New York native who teaches law at Maynooth University School of Law in Kildare, Ireland, has been thinking and writing about some of the issues around Section 3 since at least 2014, including his view that the president is not “an officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:43 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has presented strong evidence of the allowance of business dealings from Washington’s public conduct in relation to the domestic emoluments clause.) [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:20 pm
Way back in September 2017, Adam wrote about the briefs Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed in the CREW litigation. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have offered the president some solace. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:44 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I had similar concerns after oral arguments. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:28 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained why the allegations–trading one public act for another public act–do not meet the specific requirements for bribery. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
And Justice Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia in OT 1998. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman suggested another option. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
, 2021 University of Illinois Law Review Online 190 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In the Emoluments Clauses litigation, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed the methodology to consider post-ratification history. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
In November 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained our disagreement with the Amars in The Atlantic. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
Presumably, some of the signatories agree with me and my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman that the First Amendment does apply–or at least has some relevance–to impeachment proceedings. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
