Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 21 - 40
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
[I sign off from the internet for 25 hours every week. ] Tablet Magazine's profile of Seth Barrett Tillman provided a peak inside our working relationship. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:53 pm
“The Outsider Legal Genius Who May Rescue Trump: Seth Barrett Tillman is an Orthodox Jewish commodities trader turned law professor living in Dublin whose ideas were recently heard by the Supreme Court; He’s also something even more unusual: a thinker whose mind hasn’t been corrupted by politics. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
[Tillman on most things: "There are multiple aspects of the standard narrative ... that just don’t make any sense and that people just have mindlessly repeated for almost two centuries now,”] Tablet, a Jewish Magazine, published a lengthy profile of my dear colleague Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm
” And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a post titled “If Trump Prevails, How Will Section 3 Be Litigated On Or After January 20, 2025? [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
“A Response to Professor John Mikhail on ‘Officers of the United States’ — Part II; The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship; Mikhail’s arguments and evidence were not ‘ignored or overlooked’”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
“A Response to John Mikhail on ‘Officers of the United States’ — Part I; The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail has already been addressed by our scholarship; This evidence was not ‘ignored or overlooked’”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization titled "The Enforcement Act of 1870: Disqualification Myths and Realities. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Most people assume that the leading argument Seth and I have advanced is "Officers of the United. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, a New York native who teaches law at Maynooth University School of Law in Kildare, Ireland, has been thinking and writing about some of the issues around Section 3 since at least 2014, including his view that the president is not “an officer of the United States. [read post]
