Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 101 - 120
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
[Seth Barrett TIllman and I write about our experience in Judge Cannon's court, before the decision yesterday.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
Both Seth Barrett Tillman and I will be attending. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:23 am
This Essay, a response to Seth Barrett Tillman's challenge to my previous writing on founding era anxiety about corruption, is a partial exploration of the scope of the clauses relating to gifts and office holding. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman, What is the "Privilege" of the Writ of Habeas Corpus? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:10 am
The question is what the term meant to the Framers and ratifiers circa 1787. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
“A Response to Professor John Mikhail on ‘Officers of the United States’ — Part II; The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship; Mikhail’s arguments and evidence were not ‘ignored or overlooked’”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman’s amicus brief in CREW v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
(Hat tip: Mary Dudziak.)Seth Barrett Tillman, A Critique of Public International Law: Letter from Éamon De Valera to the Heads of Government of the Major Allied Powers-April 3, 1945 (2014) Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:14 am
Over at the New Reform Club, Seth Barrett Tillman argues that law professors and media commentators are wasting their time speculating about Ted Cruz's eligibility, when there is an even more complicated set of issues that could provide endless grist for the scholarly mill: He asks what would happen if a major party candidate (say, Hillary Clinton) were indicted and/or convicted (a) before the party convention, (b) before the November election, (c) before the electors… [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth Faculty of Law, has posted Originalism and the Scope of the Constitution's Disqualification Clause, which is forthcoming in the Quinnipiac Law Review 33 (2014). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:18 am
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted a set of PowerPoint slides, Comparative Public Law, Originalism, and Foreign Parliamentary Materials: One American’s Exploration of Australian Judicial and Parliamentary Materials, which he will present in Dublin to the International Commission for the History of Representative and Parliamentary Institutions on September 4, 2013. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 8:05 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Faculty of Law, has published The 1792 Madison-to-Pendleton Letter: A Time for Reconsideration, Reflection, and Response? [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 8:04 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Faculty of Law, has published The 1792 Madison-to-Pendleton Letter: A Time for Reconsideration, Reflection, and Response? [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
Harris, Bloomberg, Washington Post; two views at Volokh Conspiracy from David Post and Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman; earlier on Emoluments Clause litigation] Last year I noted the hotel-competitor fact pattern as the kind of emoluments case most likely to clear the standing hurdle; Excessive fines are unconstitutional, whether levied on persons or on groups of persons [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere and Dave Kopel on Cato/Independence Institute brief in… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Emerson, An Artifact or a Memorial: The Latin Cross and the Establishment Clause, (March 5, 2015).Caroline Mala Corbin, Exploiting Mixed Speech, (California Law Review Circuit, Vol. 103, 2015, Forthcoming).Julia Guenther, Gender and Globalization: Power Relations at India's Margins, (Journal of Developing Societies March 2015 31: 1-7).Seth Barrett Tillman, Letter from Seth Barrett Tillman to Ukip in Regard to Ukip's Supporting the… [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:33 pm
But rest assured, there is one person who wrote about these issues before anyone cared: Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
