Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 161 - 180
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am
Responding to an analysis by Hilary Hurd and Benjamin Wittes Seth Barrett Tillman argued that Senate rules do not require a full trial, and do not equate “removal” with “disqualification. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:34 am
Seth Barrett Tillman suggested that the Senate rules on impeachment do not require a full trial and that the Senate votes separately on removal and disqualification. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman proposed a framework for understanding bribery as an impeachable offense that would not apply to Trump's actions involving Ukraine. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
“Defining a Theory of ‘Bribery’ for Impeachment”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:12 pm
” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
Over at Balkinization, Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a long post addressing an unlikely problem: “Could Justice Thomas Preside over President Trump’s Impeachment Trial? [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:17 am
Check out Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman's piece at The Volokh Conspiracy on why the federal courts lack equitable jurisdiction in the border wall funding case and the emoluments challenge. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 6:09 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman (Maynooth University) and Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law) have posted What is the Plaintiff's Cause of Action in the Wall Litigation to the Volokh Conspiracy blog hosted at reason.com. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:35 am
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have a post titled “What is the Plaintiffs’ Cause of Action in the Wall Litigation? [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:05 pm
Rev. 1-183 (2019): Seth Barrett Tillman (Maynooth University), Merryman Redux: A Response to Professor John Yoo, 22 Chap. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Also, Seth Barrett Tillman’s latest brief in the emoluments-clause litigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman notes that the clause is framed in the passive voice; the president does not execute, but supervises those who execute.) [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman has posted a Understanding the Jefferson Diplomatic Gifts: A Response to Dr. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:25 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman comments on Richard H. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Thanks to Seth Barrett Tillman for the pointer. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
Harris, Bloomberg, Washington Post; two views at Volokh Conspiracy from David Post and Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman; earlier on Emoluments Clause litigation] Last year I noted the hotel-competitor fact pattern as the kind of emoluments case most likely to clear the standing hurdle; Excessive fines are unconstitutional, whether levied on persons or on groups of persons [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere and Dave Kopel on Cato/Independence Institute brief in… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Also Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackmon respond to Judge Messitte’s opinion in that Emoluments Clause decision on the Volokh Conspiracy.At the intersection of legal and medical history, Atlas Obscura has this piece on the grim profession of the "railway surgeon" in the 19th-early 20th century. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 9:10 am
For yet a different take on Mueller's constitutionality, check out Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman's piece on Lawfare, Is Robert Mueller an "Officer of the United States" or an "Employee of the United States? [read post]
