Search for: "Seth Jaffe"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
[Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh argue they do, in defense of--checks notes--Steven Donziger.] [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 1:12 pm
Foley Hoag partners Seth Jaffe and Carine La Roy-Gliezes led the Foley Hoag team, with contributions from associates Sarah Main and Alice Messin-Roizard.The post Foley Hoag Attorneys Contribute to French-U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
” At Foley Hoag’s Law & the Environment blog, Seth Jaffe writes that the court found “a workable middle ground that avoids eviscerating the statute without subjecting untold number of groundwater discharges to CWA jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At Foley Hoag’s Law & the Environment blog, Seth Jaffe writes that Monday’s decision in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
Most are patent focused, but I’m particularly looking forward to Robert Cote’s talk on Funding IP and Seth Jaffe’s discussion of CyberSecurity. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:22 pm
” (You can read a full analysis of that decision by my colleague Seth Jaffe here.) [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” At Foley Hoag’s Law and the Environment blog, Seth Jaffe remarks that “the challengers could easily have won under the ‘give me a break’ doctrine of statutory interpretation,” and that “[t]he government had only one real argument in its favor: sending these cases to the district courts is just plain nuts. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
Wisconsin, last week’s regulatory-takings decision, comes from Ilya Somin at The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Jonathan Wood at FREEcology, Jeffrey Mandell at StaffordRosenbaum’s Appellate Practice blog, and Seth Jaffe at Foley Hoag’s Law and the Environment blog. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 1:29 pm
See prior rants by Seth Jaffe in this space (here and here) concerning rulemaking by issuing interpretive guidance documents. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
Commentary on the opinion comes from Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy, Tara Golshan of Vox, Seth Jaffe for Law & The Environment, and Lisa Soronen for IMLA. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am
” Commentary comes from Michael Wara, who contends at The Stanford Lawyer that the stay “is likely to have significant ramifications both for the U.S. electric power sector and for the Paris Agreement recently concluded by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change”; from Geoffrey Barnes and Danielle Gagliardi, who at frESH review the process that led to the stay; from Kevin Johnson and Thomas Wood, who at Renewable + Law suggest that “there will be at least a year of… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Early commentary comes from Ken Silverstein for Forbes, as well as Peter Kelly-Detwiler, Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Seth Jaffe for Law and the Environment, and Katie Valentine at ThinkProgress. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
Coverage comes from Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire and Chantal Valery of Agence France-Press (via Business Insider); commentary comes from Michael Wara in the Stanford Lawyer, Lisa Soronen at the Knowledge Center, Seth Jaffe at Law and the Environment, John Burton at the World Socialist Web Site, and Richard Revesz at The Hill. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:22 pm
Memo to In-House Counsel: Minimizing Communications Babel, Part I – Pam Woldow and Doug Richardson on Pam’s blog, At The Intersection The Security, Privacy and Legal Implications of the Internet of Things (“IoT”) Part one – The Context and Use of IoT – David Navetta and Seth Jaffe of Norton Rose Fulbright on the firm’s blog, Data Protection Report Badlands or Bust? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
” At the blog of the American College of Environmental Lawyers, Seth Jaffe similarly contends that “[t]he truly interesting part of the case was in the concurring opinions. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:09 am
In the face of all this murkiness, my partner Seth Jaffe last week suggested in a blog post that perhaps it was time to kick CERCLA to the curb and start over. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:32 pm
Barbara Jaffe, NYS Supreme Ct. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:09 pm
City of Tucson, which my partner Seth Jaffe blogged about a few days ago. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:08 am
My partner in both law and blogging, Seth Jaffe, sees CTS as the continuation of the Supreme Court’s plain reading of CERCLA’s language which began in Best Foods and continued with Aviall; in those cases the Supreme Court refused to accept the mantra of CERCLA’s remedial purpose as a license to impose special rules for environmental cases which fly in the face of common law precedents and the language of the statute. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:08 am
My partner in both law and blogging, Seth Jaffe, sees CTS as the continuation of the Supreme Court’s plain reading of CERCLA’s language which began in Best Foods and continued with Aviall; in those cases the Supreme Court refused to accept the mantra of CERCLA’s remedial purpose as a license to impose special rules for environmental cases which fly in the face of common law precedents and the language of the statute. [read post]
