Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 4,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
 On appeal before the California Supreme Court the first time, the court remanded the case back to the Court of Appeal for the court to reconsider the case in light of Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Both Intervenors and the Archivist moved the District Court to dismiss the States' case as a matter of law…. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Those challenges have alleged that Black defendants are more likely than White defendants to get death sentences, even when they commit comparable crimes.In 1972, the United States Supreme Court’s Furman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:03 am by Alexis Switzer
The United States Supreme Court published its ruling today in an overtime case involving a highly paid employee. [read post]