Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
United States that the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a warrant, in most circumstances, to access GPS location information spanning seven days or more from a cell phone user. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:42 pm
From today’s United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Elonis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Celebrezze and other election law cases (including importantly, Democratic Party v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:18 pm
The post State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
The answer to this, according to a 1921 Supreme Court case, Dillon v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:16 pm
In the case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
On August 10, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the lower courts in the matter of Alexsandr Nikolaevich Kashin and the United States of America v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
On February 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari for Lozman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am
The first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:12 am
And if the United States seeks and receives permission to argue in the case, as it virtually always does in cases in which it files “friend of the court” briefs, a lawyer for the United States would argue against a lawyer for a U.S. agency – a phenomenon perhaps even more uncommon than a change in position following a change in administration. [read post]
