Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
Tillman has written about this language since 2008, and we have written about the phrase "Office . . . under the United States" during the four years of the Foreign Emoluments Clause cases. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 3:24 pm
Harris County (2000), United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomAttorney General for Northern Ireland v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
On 2 May 2023 Collins Rice J heard a case management hearing in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
The United States Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Hawaii, which upheld Donald Trump's anti-Muslim travel ban, and Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
If enacted, the Act would be the first comprehensive consumer health information privacy law in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
As of April 3, seven of the bills had been enacted into law, 20 were effectively dead, and 72 were still pending. . . [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am
The FDA did not appeal that appealable order, and when seven States that might take such an appeal asked to intervene, the FDA opposed their request. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
S. ____ (2023) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 22A901 _________________ DANCO LABORATORIES, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
On Mar. 30, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its judgment on the merits in Certain Iranian Assets, nearly seven years after the case between Iran and the United States was first filed. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
Even making the demonstrably false assumption that all of these cases require a visit to one of the thousands of emergency rooms in the United States, it is far from a "statistical certainty" that one of the plaintiff doctors will handle one of these cases, as these cases represent a tiny fraction of the over 130 million emergency department visits each year. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Because appointing a justice generally requires a seven-member majority, the incumbent justices could block the appointment of a new member. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
If that were the case, no drug on the U.S. market would meet Judge Kacsmaryk’s standards. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am
Rashmi Srivastava v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Because the district court found that the conduct relevant to PLCAA’s focus occurred in the United States, it decided to apply that statute to the case, even though other relevant facts occurred abroad. [read post]
