Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 4,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Karson Taylor
Shimabukuro explains that in Virginia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 11:09 am by Bona Law PC
But it does not prohibit the market dynamic known as an oligopoly, which is a structure prevalent in numerous industries across the United States and the world. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Mahoney, et al., Case No. 4:24-tc-0500 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia) The RNC sued seven Georgia counties, alleging that these counties violated the law by keeping certain election offices open over the weekend to allow voters to return their absentee ballots. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 25 October 2024, Knowles J handed down judgement in the case of Northcott v Hundey [2024] EWHC 2704 (KB). [read post]
Cipla, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
Cipla, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
Cipla, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently granted Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 2:39 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
Bottom Line This case presents a close call for public employers governed by the First Amendment, as illustrated by a 2022 case, Hernandez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:45 am by Norman L. Eisen
Beals (Virginia, state court); (16) United Sovereign Americans, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The importance of this initial consideration was recently reinforced in an August 2024 decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
However, the court emphasised the importance of maintaining the default costs rule, stating that departures from this rule should be limited and require cogent reasons, which were not sufficiently established in this case. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Kurt Bassuener
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]