Search for: "Seward v. Seward" Results 61 - 80 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Yvonne Ward, No. 99,549 (Seward)Direct appeal (petition for review); Distribution/ConspiracyNancy OgleInsufficient evidenceAllowing persons in jail clothing to sit in courtroom for ID purposesState v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:52 am
Roy Seward, No. 100,263 (Saline)Sentencing appeal (Jessica's Law)Rachel L. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim rooted in fraud must be pleaded with the requisite particularity under CPLR 3016 (b)’ ” (Shahid v Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council, Inc., 181 AD3d 744, 745 [2020], quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]). [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:35 am by Randall Hodgkinson
David McDaniel, No. 101,634 (Seward)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Patrick H. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To sustain a cause of action for breach of contract, the plaintiff must prove the existence of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance, the defendant’s breach, and damages (see Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the cause of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty was subject to a three-year statute of limitations since the relief sought was monetary in nature and the complaint failed to allege all the requisite elements of fraud, including justifiable reliance (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 562; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d at 140; Oppedisano v D’Agostino, 196 AD3d 497, 499). [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘The elements of a cause of action for fraud require a material misrepresentation of a fact, knowledge of its falsity, an intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance by the plaintiff and damages'” (Emby Hosiery Corp. v Tawil, 196 AD3d 462, 464, quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559). [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Seward, 49 M.J. 369 (C.A.A.F. 1998); United States v. [read post]