Search for: "Shafer v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
November 20, 2023 | By: Michael Shafer and Alex Butterman The legal landscape for trademark owners changed significantly in 2023 because in Spireon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
In Cyntec Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
David Shafer (1:23-cv-03720) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Still): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
Shafer, 74 Misc. 3d 405, 413, 160 N.Y.S.3d 817 (Ulster Cty. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 5:52 am
(available online with subscription at: https://www.sfchronicle.com/food/wine/article/napa-valley-california-winery-17667357.php) 2Terlato Wine Grp., Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
” Avco Corp. v. [read post]
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
As a result, the law and practice of grand juries varies state-by-state. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
In a separate ongoing proceeding, Hernandez Lara v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Nev. 2012) (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:49 am
The Institutional Hearing Program: A Study of Prison-Based Immigration Courts in the United States by Ingrid V. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Guth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:15 am
& Const. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am
Her majority decisions included Shafer v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
