Search for: "Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS to Decide Whether Class Action Counterclaims Can Be Removed Under Class Action Fairness Act
3 Oct 2018, 5:47 am by Wystan Ackerman
The Fourth Circuit’s decision noted that Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Insurance Class Actions Insider - http://www.insuranceclassactions.com/
CAFA and the Third-Party Defendant: Removal to Federal Court?
10 May 2011, 1:47 am
Further, the court relied upon the meaning of “defendant” was only “original or true” defendants, relying upon Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Blog - http://www.carltonfields.com/classactionblog/blog.aspx
"Any Defendant" In CAFA Is Only An Original Defendant, Not a Counterclaim Defendant
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
  The Court noted that in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
Is A CounterClaim Defendant “Any Defendant” Under CAFA?
11 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
  The key to the Court’s analysis was that section § 1453(b), permitting removal by “any defendant,” only includes “original” or “true” defendants based on Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Blog - http://www.carltonfields.com/classactionblog/blog.aspx
"My client wanted to remove but the District Court said no, no, no. "Any defendant" does not mean "Any Defendant.""
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
In Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
According to the Seventh Circuit, a Counter Defendant Is Not A 'Defendant' Under CAFA; Thus, Class Action Counterclaims Cannot Be Removed.
8 May 2010, 5:30 am
’  In 1941 the Supreme Court, in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
Counter-Defendant Cannot Remove Under CAFA--Ohio Joins The Majority Group.
29 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
Ohio) explained that “any” can only modify the word “defendant” as that word had been previously defined by the Supreme Court in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
Counterclaim-Defendants, Even if Never Original Plaintiffs, Cannot Remove Under CAFA
24 May 2017, 3:00 am by cafalawblog@mcglinchey.com (McGlinchey Stafford PLLC)
Responding to Home Depot’s argument, the court went into a discussion of Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Fairness Act Blog - http://www.cafalawblog.com/
CAFA Class Action Defense Cases-Progressive West v. Preciado: Class Action Fairness Act Of 2005 (CAFA) Does Not Permit Cross-Defendant To Remove Class Action Cross-Complaint Ninth Circuit Holds
20 Mar 2007, 5:22 am
The Court reasoned as follows: in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
Supreme Court Rules That Third-Party Counterclaim Defendants Cannot Remove Class Actions Under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA)
28 May 2019, 4:41 pm by Wystan Ackerman
The Court also reasoned that: (1) the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure distinguish between “defendants,” “third-party defendants,” and “counterclaim defendants”; (2) other removal statutes in the bankruptcy and patent/copyright context allow “any party” to remove; and (3) the Court held in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Insurance Class Actions Insider - http://www.insuranceclassactions.com/
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2018: #1 The Impact Of The U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
Workplace Class Action Blog - http://www.workplaceclassaction.com/