Search for: "Shapiro v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am by Kyle Persaud
One of the most important Supreme Court decisions protecting the right to travel is Shapiro v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Kyle Persaud
One of the most important Supreme Court decisions protecting the right to travel is Shapiro v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm by Amy Howe
Perhaps somewhat to Shapiro’s surprise, Gorsuch then asked about Teague v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
As witness Gary Shapiro suggested, imposing overly “prescriptive” requirements that are not based on a proper cost-benefit analysis might unintentionally harm innovation or delay the development of a product that requires a different approach. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:27 pm by Josh Blackman
I wrote; Ilya Shapiro and I filed the Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
As a consequence, the United States Supreme Court has refused to provide advisory opinions since 1793. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at a hospital and affirmed the Court’s previous decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]