Search for: "Shapiro v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
United States being overruled. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:01 am
In Friday’s Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
United States, Justice Neil Gorsuch’s majority opinion made a clear point about Chevron deference in the context of an otherwise low-key statutory-interpretation case. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, “involves the privacy implications of our rapidly evolving use of technology in the digital age — and the need for our laws to evolve in tandem. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:45 am
Shapiro Peter D. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am
” The CATO Institute’s Ilya Shapiro saw the Murphy decision as reinforcing several potential states-rights issues. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Meggan DeWitt contend that “[w]hen it hears Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
