Search for: "Sharp v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
   This will allow plaintiffs to argue that their claims somehow “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with sufficient force to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality announced in Kiobel. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:19 am
Tony Mauro describes a recent episode of Boston Legal which engaged in a direct attack on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Today's LA Times has An unexpected check on Supreme Court’s sharp move right: Justice KavanaughLaw360 has 5 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Fall, 'Administrative State' Attacks Soar To High Court Crescendo and First-Time Advocates Dominate High Court's Fall Schedule, the last of which begins:Solo practitioner Howard Bashman had almost given up all hope on his goal of arguing before the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
Phelps, a case in which the Westboro Baptist Church (consisting of approximately 50 Phelps family members and a few others) used a fallen marine’s funeral to further their message that “God Hates Fags” and the United States is being punished for tolerating homosexuality by, among other things, losing soldiers in Iraq. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
  The Court’s appetite for more of this dish appears to be notably sharp in Janus: in considering certiorari, the justices took the relatively unusual step of inviting the Solicitor General to express the views of the United States on whether to hear the case; then when the SG recommended denying certiorari, the justices took the highly unusual step of granting it anyway. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
Dingman, supra (quoting United States v. [read post]